Religion and Ecology: The Philosophical Relationship Between God, Nature, and Humanity


Date Published : 8 October 2025

Contributors

Luthfiana Zahriani

Author

Ah. Kholis Hayatuddin

Author

Fery Dona

Author

Keywords

Religion Ecology God Nature Human Relations Environmental Ethics

Proceeding

Track

General Track

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Said Annual Roundtable on Indonesia and Religious Affairs

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Studies on the relationship between religion and ecology demonstrate a profound connection between God, nature, and humanity from a philosophical perspective. Although various studies have addressed the theological dimension of ecology, a research gap remains in holistically exploring how spiritual and religious values shape ecological ethics that can respond to the contemporary environmental crisis. Most previous studies have focused solely on ecological norms in sacred texts, but have not explored the relational philosophical dimension that simultaneously involves transcendental (God), cosmic (nature), and existential (human) aspects. Therefore, this study aims to answer the following research question: How can the construction of a philosophical relationship between God, nature, and humanity within a religious framework contribute to ecological awareness and understanding? The method used is a qualitative approach with a philosophical-religious literature study. Data were obtained through an in-depth review of religious literature, the thoughts of spiritual figures, and environmental philosophy. Preliminary results indicate that in various religious traditions, the relationship between God, nature, and humanity is built on the principle of interconnectedness and spiritual responsibility, where humans are not the dominant center, but rather part of the cosmic order that must be maintained. The implications of this relationship open up space for the development of a spiritually-based environmental ethics, which can serve as the foundation for sustainable ecological practices in social life. This research is expected to provide theoretical contributions to ecological philosophy and religiously based sustainability practices.

References

Amril, A., & Hadi, R. T. (2024). KRISIS IDENTITAS MANUSIA DAN EKOLOGI MODERN DALAM PERSPEKTIF EKO-FILOSOFI SEYYED HOSSEIN NASR. Living Islam: Journal of Islamic Discourses, 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.14421/lijid.v7i2.5368
Analisis Hadis tentang Ekoteologi dan Relevansinya dalam Membangun Kesadaran Lingkungan melalui Pendidikan Sekolah Alam | Al-I’tibar: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. (t.t.). Diambil 26 Juli 2025, dari https://journal.unuha.ac.id/index.php/JPIA/article/view/3858
Apriesta, Z. (2024, Juli 24). Peneliti PPIM, Iim Halimatusa’diyah: Green Islam masih belum banyak dipahami oleh masyarakat. PPIM UIN Jakarta. https://ppim.uinjkt.ac.id/2024/07/24/peneliti-ppim-iim-halimatusadiyah-green-islam-masih-belum-banyak-dipahami-oleh-masyarakat/
Assya’bani, R. (2023). Re-Interpertasi Filosofis Post-Modernisme pada Relasi Triadik dalam Filsafat Pendidikan Islam: Tuhan, Manusia dan Alam. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 17(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.35931/aq.v17i4.2319
Berry, T. (2009). The Sacred Universe: Earth, Spirituality, and Religion in the Twenty-first Century. Columbia University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/berr14952
Ekologi dan Tinjauan Filsafat Sains Pendidikan Islam | Baharuddin | Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan. (t.t.). Diambil 26 Juli 2025, dari https://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/25629
Foltz, R. C. (2006). Animals in Islamic Tradition and Muslim Cultures. Oneworld.
Huberman, M., & Miles, M. B. (2002). The qualitative researcher’s companion. sage.
Messias, T. (2024). From Ecotheology to Ecospirituality in Laudato sí—Ecological Spirituality beyond Christian Religion. Religions, 15(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010068
Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif edisi revisi. http://library.stik-ptik.ac.id/detail?id=7251&lokasi=lokal
Nasr, S. H. (1990). Man and Nature: The Spiritual Crisis of Modern Man. Unwin Paperbacks.
(PDF) Ekoteologi dalam Pemikiran Seyyed Hossein Nasr dan Relasi Agama-Masyarakat. (t.t.). ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.35878/alitimad.v2i2.1320
Preston, J. L., & Baimel, A. (2021). Towards a psychology of religion and the environment. Current Opinion in Psychology, 40, 145–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.09.013
Rofiah, C., & Bungin, B. (2021). Qualitative methods: Simple research with triangulation theory design. Develop, 5(1), 18–28.
Saputro, D. E., & Gunadi, D. (2021). Ekoteologi Komunitas Sedulur Sikep. Jurnal Abdiel, 5(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.37368/ja.v5i1.243
Sihombing, B., Amril, & Dewi, E. (2025). Penguatan Kecerdasan Teologis Dan Teleologis (Pendekatan Theo-Antropo-Ekologis): Penelitian. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dan Riset Pendidikan, 3(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v3i4.1115
Teologi Sosial dan Isu Lingkungan: Membangun Kesadaran Ekologis Berbasis Spiritual | Berkat: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama dan Katolik. (t.t.). Diambil 26 Juli 2025, dari https://ejournal.aripafi.or.id/index.php/Berkat/article/view/667
Visi dan Ragam Gerakan Green Islam di Indonesia – PPI UNAS. (t.t.). Diambil 26 Juli 2025, dari https://ppi.unas.ac.id/visi-dan-ragam-gerakan-green-islam-di-indonesia/
White, L. (1967). The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis. Science, 155(3767), 1203–1207.
Widiarto, W., & Wilaela, W. (2022). EKOTEOLOGIS Perspektif Agama-Agama. TOLERANSI: Media Ilmiah Komunikasi Umat Beragama, 13(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.24014/trs.v13i2.16101

Downloads

How to Cite

Luthfiana Zahriani, L. Z., Ah. Kholis Hayatuddin, A. K. H., & Fery Dona, F. D. (2025). Religion and Ecology: The Philosophical Relationship Between God, Nature, and Humanity. Said Annual Roundtable on Indonesia and Religious Affairs, 1(1), 191-204. https://conferences.uinsaid.ac.id/sarira/paper/view/292