Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta
International Conference on Islamic Education and Instruction

Implementation and Evaluation of Website-Based English Learning at SMPN 2 Sidareja Using the CIPP Model

Date Published : 6 March 2026

Contributors

Muhammad Mustangin

Author

Nurul Alfiah

Author

Nanda Ummu Kulsum

Author

Keywords

Evaluation English Language Teaching E-Portfolio CIPP Model

Proceeding

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): International Conference on Islamic Education and Instruction 2025

Track

General Track

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of e-portfolio-based English language learning at SMP N 2 Sidareja using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model proposed by Stufflebeam (2010). The research employed a mixed-method approach, with data collected through observation, questionnaires, and interviews. The participants consisted of 35 students, 3 English teachers, 1 principal, and 1 curriculum coordinator. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS. The instrument validity test results ranged from 0.612 to 0.823, and the reliability analysis indicated high reliability (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.876). The findings reveal that the implementation of e-portfolio-based learning aligns with the established instructional objectives. In terms of context, the use of e-portfolios supports efforts to improve students’ English proficiency. Regarding input, the availability of facilities and infrastructure, as well as institutional support, was considered adequate. In the process dimension, e-portfolios were used consistently and effectively encouraged active student engagement. Quantitative data demonstrated an increase in positive student responses, from 67% (M = 2.68) to 98% (M = 3.85). Qualitative findings further indicated that teachers felt more confident in integrating digital technology into their teaching practices. In the product dimension, the use of e-portfolios had a positive impact on students’ comprehension, participation, and English communication skills, both oral and written. Overall, the study concludes that e-portfolio-based English learning not only enhances instructional effectiveness but also creates a more meaningful and engaging learning experience through the integration of digital technology.

References

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
Kholidiyah, N., Murtadho, F., & Mahliatussikah, H. (2023). The effect of portfolio-based assessment on students’ learning independence and language skills. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(2), 345–353.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
M. Mustangin and B. Riswanto, “The challenges and opportunities: CIPP model for TEFL evaluation following the COVID-19 pandemic,” Jurnal Teknologi dan Bisnis, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu
M. Mustangin, “Improve student engagement and collaboration with Kahoot!,” Jurnal Teknologi dan Bahasa, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://ejurnal.stmikkomputama.ac.id
Magdalena, I., et al. (2023). Portfolio-based assessment in improving students’ learning outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 8(1), 45–54.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka framework. Government of Indonesia.
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union.
Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In V. Patel (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 375–383). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Strohmeier, S. (2010). Student e-portfolios: Perspectives and challenges. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 38(4), 405–423.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 31–62). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2007). CIPP evaluation model checklist: A tool for applying the CIPP model to assess projects and programs. Western Michigan University, Evaluation Center.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and applications (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. Jossey-Bass.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. Jossey-Bass.
Wulandari, D., Suryoputro, G., & Mulyono, H. (2024). The use of Facebook as an e-portfolio platform to enhance students’ speaking engagement. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 112–123.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Downloads

How to Cite

Muhammad, M., Nurul, N., & Nanda Ummu, N. U. (2026). Implementation and Evaluation of Website-Based English Learning at SMPN 2 Sidareja Using the CIPP Model. International Conference on Islamic Education and Instruction, 2(1), 304-318. https://conferences.uinsaid.ac.id/iciei/paper/view/850