Educational Inequity in Pesantren: Examining How Parental Socioeconomic Status Shapes Student Achievement in Bandung


Date Published : 6 March 2026

Contributors

Santi Dianah

Author

Ukhtul Iffah Luthfiyyah Mursida

Author

Keywords

Educational inequity pesantren socioeconomic status student achievement

Proceeding

Track

General Track

Abstract

Socioeconomic status (SES) of a family in society is determined by several factors, such as income, education, and occupation. This study adopts James Coleman's social capital framework to investigate how parents' socioeconomic status can influence student achievement in one of the pesantren in Bandung, West Java, as well as the disparities it generates within the institution. While this topic has been widely examined, studies that specifically explore this reality in pesantren, which have different systems, cultures, and resources from other institutions, remain very limited. This study aims to fill that gap by examining how parents' socioeconomic status may affect students' achievements in the pesantren. This study employed a qualitative descriptive method with a case study approach. Data collection was carried out through multiple methods; open-ended questionnaires, in-depth interviews, and analysis of student achievement records. The informants included nineteen parents of high-achieving students, three homeroom teachers, and two school principals. The findings demonstrate a strong relationship between parental socioeconomic status and student achievement. All high-achieving students at the pesantren came from middle-to-upper economic backgrounds families, well-educated, and actively involved in community organizations. The conclusion of this study highlights the importance of affirmative programs for students from lower-class families to enhance their competencies so that they can compete on an equal footing with others.

References

Ali N. et al. (2023) Academic performance of children in relation to gender, parenting styles, and socioeconomic status: What attributes are important. PLOS ONE 18(11): e0286823. https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286823
Ali, N., Khuwaja, F. M., Ali, Z., Ahmed, N., & Ashraf, H. (2023). Academic performance of children in relation to gender, parenting styles, and socioeconomic status: What attributes are important? PLOS ONE, 18(11), e0286823. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286823
Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Bandung. (2024). Kecamatan Pangalengan dalam Angka 2024 (Vol. 13). Bandung: BPS Kabupaten Bandung. Diakses dari https://bandungkab.bps.go.id
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
Creswell, John W. (2014). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Etor, C. R., Mbon, U. F., & Ekanem, E. E. (2013). Primary education as a foundation for qualitative higher education in Nigeria. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v2n2p155
Hodgkin, S., & McNamara, O. (2018). The relevance of formal and nonformal primary education in relation to pupils’ transition: A case study from the Solomon Islands. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(2), 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1554022
McLeod, S. (2020). Teori sistem ekologi Bronfenbrenner. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/bronfenbrenner.html
Mukundi, M. B. (2024). Effects of socio-economic status on academic performance of undergraduate students at Africa International University Karen, Nairobi [Thesis, Africa International University]. Greener Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.15580/gjss.2024.102024138
Mulasi, S., Walidin, W., & Silahuddin, S. (2023). Konsep sosiologis dalam pendidikan perspektif Ibn Khaldun: Suatu analisis psikopedagogik. At-Ta’dib: Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Pendidikan Agama Islam, 15(2), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.47498/tadib.v15i2.2323
Radzi, N. M., & Kenayathulla, H. B. (2017). Educational equity for Malaysian urban poor Muslim students. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management (MOJEM), 5(4), 47–62. http://mojem.um.edu.my
S-2 Pendidikan Dasar UNESA. (2024, 30 Oktober). Mengapa pendidikan dasar menjadi penting di era modern? Universitas Negeri Surabaya. https://s2dikdas.fip.unesa.ac.id/post/mengapa-pendidikan-dasar-menjadi- penting-di-era-modern
Warga School. (2024, Agustus 15). Peran orang tua mendukung pendidikan anak. https://kbtk.warga.sch.id/2024/08/15/peran-orang-tua-mendukung- pendidikan-anak/
Wils, A., Naidoo, J., Patrinos, H. A., & Nguyen, V. (2013). Simulations for equity in education: Background paper for UNICEF. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF).
Winarti, D. W., Fatimah, R., Fathani, A. H., & Lukman, L. (2023). Unleashing the potential: Spatializing middle school mathematics for enhanced learning. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 8(3), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v8i3.3020
World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realize education’s promise. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-109

Downloads

How to Cite

Santi, S., & Ukhtul Iffah Luthfiyyah, U. I. L. (2026). Educational Inequity in Pesantren: Examining How Parental Socioeconomic Status Shapes Student Achievement in Bandung. International Conference on Islamic Education and Instruction, 2(1), 218-229. https://conferences.uinsaid.ac.id/iciei/paper/view/843