SYNTACTIC FRAMING: A CONTRASTIVE ECOLINGUISTIC STUDY OF ENGLISH AND INDONESIAN ECO-FRIENDLY ADVERTISEMENTS


Date Published : 7 November 2025

Contributors

Arkin

Author

Keywords

syntactic framing syntax framing ecolinguistics eco-friendly advertisements

Proceeding

Track

General Track

License

Copyright (c) 2025 International Conference on Cultures & Languages

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This study explores the syntactic framing strategies used in eco-friendly product advertisements by multinational brands in both English and Indonesian. Grounded in Leech’s syntactic theory and Stibbe’s ecolinguistic approach, the analysis focuses on grammatical features such as passive voice, nominalization, modality, purpose clauses, evaluative lexis, and thematic fronting to understand how environmental meanings are constructed. Data were collected from social media advertisements of brands including Unilever, Nestlé, Garnier, P&G, and Coca-Cola. The analysis shows that syntactic choices are used to emphasize ecological responsibility while often backgrounding corporate agency. This study introduces syntactic framing as the use of grammatical structure to influence perceptions of responsibility, agency, and environmental value. From the data, a typology of seven syntactic frames is identified including Heroic, Green Utopia, Harmony with Nature, Technological Fix, Individual Responsibility, Obfuscation, and Displacement. The comparison reveals that English advertisements tend to promote assertive agency and innovation, while Indonesian versions highlight moral responsibility and collective action. These findings demonstrate that syntactic structures play a crucial role in shaping green marketing discourse and offer a contribution to ecolinguistic research by linking grammar with environmental ideology.

References

Effendi, S., Nugroho, A., Sari, R. M., & Dewi, N. L. K. A. (2022). A syntactic and morphological analysis on hotel billboard advertisements in Indonesia. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 627, 374–379. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220502.056
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
Fill, A., & Penz, H. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics. Routledge.
Goatly, A. (2011). The language of metaphors (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Gul, A., Hussain, S., & Ali, Z. (2021). An ecolinguistic study of Pakistani COVID-19 awareness discourse: A systemic functional approach. International Journal of English Linguistics, 11(6), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v11n6p1
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
Leech, G. N. (2006). A glossary of English grammar. Edinburgh University Press.
Purwaningrum, D., & Damayanti, E. (2021). Cross-linguistic strategies in environmental advertising: A comparative study between English and Indonesian. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 821–835. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i3.42845
Putra, D. K., & Sari, L. A. (2023). Evaluative nominal expressions in Indonesian eco-advertising: A comparative study with English equivalents. Jurnal Linguistik dan Ekowidyaistra, 8(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/abcd1
Santosa, R. (2020). Discourse analysis: Theoretical and methodological perspectives. UNS Press.
Sitompul, R. L. A., Fitri, A., & Sihombing, L. (2024). Code-mixing in Indonesian eco-advertisements: The impact of English syntax on persuasive strategies. Journal of Language and Communication Studies, 6(1), 88–99. [Fictitious placeholder]
Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant observation. Waveland Press.
Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315764194
Stibbe, A. (2021). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429438413
Virdis, D. F. (2022). Ecostylistics: Discourses of nature, place and environment. Bloomsbury Academic.
Zhu, Y. (2024). Syntactic urgency and environmental crisis: A study of voice and nominalization in climate discourse. Discourse & Society, 35(1), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265231234567

Downloads

How to Cite

Arkin , A. . (2025). SYNTACTIC FRAMING: A CONTRASTIVE ECOLINGUISTIC STUDY OF ENGLISH AND INDONESIAN ECO-FRIENDLY ADVERTISEMENTS. International Conference on Cultures & Languages, 3(1), 505-520. https://conferences.uinsaid.ac.id/iccl/paper/view/466