Language as a Tool of Struggle: A Sociopragmatic Analysis of Demand Statements in Police Reports on Demonstrations
Date Published : 7 November 2025
Contributors
Dr. Tri Santoso, M.Pd.
Author
Dr. Hari Kusmanto, M.Pd.
Second Author
Keywords
Language as a Tool of Struggle: A Sociopragmatic Analysis of Demand Statements in Police Reports on Demonstrations
Proceeding
Track
General Track
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Conference on Cultures & Languages
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Language in police reports on demonstrations often functions not merely as a neutral record of events but as a strategic device that conveys demands, frames social struggles, and legitimizes authority or resistance. The study employs a descriptive qualitative research method that includes the types of illocutionary acts and social functions of the 39 online news headlines as data. Data were gathered through documentation, observation, and note-taking and were analysed using methods of intralingual matching and pragmatic matching. Results show that the directive illocutionary acts, conveying explicit demands or commands, are dominant (87.18%), followed by expressive acts (7.69%) and assertives (5.13%). Outstanding social functions include investigation on corruption/illegality (48.72%), dismissal/job negotiating (17.95%), protection/rejotion of environment/project (7.69%) and other functions (e.g., demand for social justice, demand for lifting the life-level of the public, socialistic critique), ranging from 2.56% to 10.26%). In a global context, these issues are very easy to relate to both for anticorruption and environmental campaigns around the developing world who are fighting the same governance issues in their home countries. Interdisciplinarily, this research adds to the field of linguistics, sociology and communication studies to explain that on-line media language does not work purely as informative, airchanal language, but also it works like a strategic device of Indonesia civil movement in order to mobilize society, to stem up a civil advocacy, and influence on public policy in contemporary Indonesia. They reinforce language as a catalyst of social innovation under the democratizing navalieu of democracy and global justice.
References
Antonopoulos, I., Robu, V., Couraud, B., Kirli, D., Norbu, S., Kiprakis, A., Flynn, D., Elizondo-Gonzalez, S., & Wattam, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches to energy demand-side response: A systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109899
Arias Álvarez, A. (2024). Linguistic landscapes of activism: The fight for a quality public healthcare in Madrid. Journal of Language and Politics, 23(6), 896–919.
Batrisyia, A., Putri Nabila, M., Siringoringo, N. D., & Hasanah Harahap, S. (2024). Dinamika Variasi Bahasa dalam Kerangka Sosiolinguistik terhadap Analisis Faktor-faktor Sosial dalam Perubahan Bahasa di Masyarakat Multibahasa pada Era Globalisasi. Journal on Education, 6(4), 21448–21454.
Budiman, B. (2022). Pemanfaatan Media Sosial sebagai Media Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. EUNOIA (Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia), 2(2), 149–156.
Cornish, R. P., Teyhan, A., Tilling, K., Macleod, J., & Brennan, I. (2025). Measuring serious violence perpetration: comparison of police-recorded and self-reported data in a UK cohort. International Journal of Population Data Science, 10(1), 1–16.
Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Cushing, I. (2020). Power, policing, and language policy mechanisms in schools: A response to Hudson. Language in Society, 49(3), 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740452000038X
Diessel, H., & Coventry, K. R. (2020). Demonstratives in Spatial Language and Social Interaction: An Interdisciplinary Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(November), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.555265
Donatz-Fest, Isabelle. (2024). The ‘doings’ behind data: An ethnography of police data construction. Big Data & Society, 11(3), 20539517241270696. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241270695
Finch, B. K., Thomas, K., Beck, A. N., Burghart, D. B., Klinger, D., & Johnson, R. R. (2022). Assessing Data Completeness, Quality, and Representativeness of Justifiable Homicides in the FBI’s Supplementary Homicide Reports: A Research Note. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 38(1), 267–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-021-09493-x
Greenwald, M. L., & Daniels, D. E. (2024). When adults with speech-language impairment meet law enforcement: A qualitative analysis of client experiences. Journal of Communication Disorders, 112, 106471. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106471
Güss, C. D., Tuason, M. T., & Devine, A. (2020). Problems With Police Reports as Data Sources: A Researchers’ Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(October), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582428
Hasfi, Nurul, Pednekar-Magal, Vandana, Rimban, Luz, Sunarto, Sunarto, & Yusriana, Amida. (2024). Digital dissent: How Indonesian and Filipino journalists converge with virtual communities to face state repression. Global Media and Communication, 20(3), 329–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427665241288949
Hayati, R. (2021). Variasi Bahasa Dan Kelas Sosial. Pena Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Teknologi, 35(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.31941/jurnalpena.v35i1.1348
Healey, P. G. T., Khare, P., Castro, I., Tyson, G., Karan, M., Shekhar, R., McQuistin, S., Perkins, C., & Purver, M. (2023). Power and vulnerability: managing sensitive language in organizational communication. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(1987). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1266425
Hikmah, E. F. (2025). Bahasa sebagai Identitas Gender: Studi Kasus Penggunaan Bahasa di Media Sosial X. SeBaSa, 8(1), 210–223.
House, J., Kádár, D. Z., Todorović, T., Klemenčič, M., Hazemali, D., Onič, T., & Plemenitaš, K. (2024). Capturing power in diplomatic language use: The case of a closed-door mediatory negotiation and its aftermath during the breakup of the former Yugoslavia. Journal of Language and Politics, December.
Joullié, J.-E., Gould, A. M., Spillane, R., & Luc, S. (2021). The language of power and authority in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(4), 101491. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101491
Kalmoe, N. P. (2014). Fueling the Fire: Violent Metaphors, Trait Aggression, and Support for Political Violence. Political Communication, 31(4), 545–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.852642
Khan, M., Mowbray, P. K., & Wilkinson, A. (2025). Forging New Voice Mechanisms From a Crisis—Employee Voice on Social Media During COVID-19. Human Resource Management Journal, 35(3), 713–727. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12591
Lacina, J., & Griffith, R. (2021). The Power of Language. Reading Teacher, 74(5), 481–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1996
López-Espino, J. (2024). Giving and Taking Voice: Metapragmatic Dismissals of Parents in Child Welfare Court Cases. Law & Social Inquiry, 49(3), 1453–1478. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/lsi.2023.50
Mahsun. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bahasa Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi Metode dan Tekniknya. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Miranda, A., Lasman, D., & Putri, A. (2021). Political Language of Young People on the Demonstration of September 24, 2019. Struktural, 1. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.30-12-2020.2311263
Parker, S. T. (2022). Measuring gun violence in police data sources: transitioning to NIBRS. Injury Epidemiology, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-022-00376-8
Pérez-Durán, I., & Hernández-Sánchez, A. (2025). General and Substantive Accountability in Nursing Home Services: Assessing Messages from the Demand Side and the Supply Side. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 37(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2024.2348964
Prayitno, H. J., Markhamah, Nasucha, Y., Huda, M., Ratih, K., Ubaidullah, Rohmadi, M., Boeriswati, E., & Thambu, N. (2022). Prophetic educational values in the Indonesian language textbook: pillars of positive politeness and character education. Heliyon, 8(8), e10016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10016
Risnawati, E., Gunawan, W., Fatinova, D., Kurniawan, M. A., Setyawan, H., & Mubarok, Y. (2025). Power Reflections in the Illocutionary Acts of Consumers and Drivers in the Indonesian Context. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(2), 624–634. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1502.32
Sari, D. N., & Utomo, A. P. Y. (2020). Directive speech act in President Joko Widodo’s speech related to handling coronavirus (Covid-19) in Indonesia (Pragmatic review). Journal of Social Studies (JSS), 16(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.21831/jss.v16i1.32072
Schade, S., & Thielgen, M. M. (2022). Commentary: Problems With Police Reports as Data Sources: A Researchers’ Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(June), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873235
Schneider, K. P. (2022). Referring to Speech Acts in Communication: Exploring Meta-Illocutionary Expressions in ICE-Ireland. Corpus Pragmatics, 6(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-022-00123-w
Schoppa, D. J. (2025). What the meta-illocutionary lexicon can tell us about speech act taxonomies. Journal of Pragmatics, 237, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2025.01.002
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Act: An Essay on the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Setiawan, K. M. P., & Tomsa, D. (2023). Defending a Vulnerable yet Resilient Democracy: Civil Society Activism in Jokowi’s Indonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 42(3), 350–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034231209058
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Sanata Dharma University Press.
Trotzke, A., & Reimer, L. A. U. R. A. (2023). Comprehending non-canonical and indirect speech acts in German. Journal of Linguistics, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226723000336
Uwen, G. (2023). Objection Overruled: Language Dynamics and Power Relations in Courtroom Interactions. Language Matters, 54(2), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2023.2229533
Vilaça, L. (2024). A Social Movement Model for Judicial Behavior: Evidence from Brazil’s Anti-Corruption Movements. Social Forces, 103(1), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soae065
Wahyuningroem, S. L., Sirait, R., Uljanatunnisa, U., & Heryadi, D. (2024). Youth political participation and digital movement in Indonesia: the case of #ReformasiDikorupsi and #TolakOmnibusLaw. F1000Research, 12, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.122669.3
Weinberg, M. (2021). Scale-making, power and agency in arbitrating school-level language planning decisions. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(1–2), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1741207
Wischermann, J., Dang, T. V. P., & Sirait, G. M. (2023). The State in a Capitalist Society: Protests and State Reactions in Vietnam and Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 53(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2022.2038235
Zhou, J., Zheng, Y., & Tai, J. H.-M. (2020). Grudges and gratitude: the social-affective impacts of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(3), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1643449
Downloads
How to Cite
Tri, T. (2025). Language as a Tool of Struggle: A Sociopragmatic Analysis of Demand Statements in Police Reports on Demonstrations. International Conference on Cultures & Languages, 3(1), 712-728. https://conferences.uinsaid.ac.id/iccl/paper/view/444