Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta
International Conference on Cultures & Languages

Buddhist Paradoxical Logic as an Epistemological Method to the Ultimate Knowledge: From Dharmakirti’s Svavacanavirodha to Nishida’s Logic of Absolute Self-Contradiction

Date Published : 5 December 2025

Contributors

Galuh Nur Fattah

Author

Keywords

Buddhist Paradoxical Logic Dharmakirti Nishida Kitarō Svavacanavirodha The logic of Absolute Self-Contradiction

Proceeding

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Proceeding of International Conference on Cultures & Languages 2025

Track

General Track

License

Copyright (c) 2025 International Conference on Cultures & Languages

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This article comprehensively explains the structure of Buddhist logic in explaining or describing the highest knowledge. The highest knowledge (Maha Prajñā) in question is knowledge of Nirvana (Pāli: Nibbāna). Buddhism describes Nirvana through paradoxical logic which, when viewed from the perspective of deductive logic in the Western logical tradition, is certainly invalid and often even concluded to be a fallacy. Although considered invalid or even a fallacy, Buddhist paradoxical logic has a functional mode, namely as a transcendental effort to optionally remove obstacles that arise from the mind and ultimately be able to directly experience the most authentic reality. This is what is called the highest knowledge. In solving this work, a conceptual analysis method was carried out with a literature study research model. From the results of the search and analysis, it was found that paradoxical logic is often present in classical Buddhist texts such as the Prajñā Pāramitā Hṛdaya Sūtra and Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra. This logic was later structured by Dharmakirti as a method of debate and referred to as Svavacanavirodha. In contemporary Eastern philosophical studies, this logic influences the logic of absolute self-contradiction or concrete logic (gutaiteki ronri) developed by Nishida Kitarō as an attempt to understand the nature of reality. In spiritual application, this logic can be developed as a method to liberate oneself from mental disturbances that can hinder the development of the intuitive dimension, thus making enlightenment more attainable.

References

Aquinas, T. (1964). Summa Theologiae (M. T. Clark (Ed.)). Eyre & Spottiswoode.
Bakker, A., & Zubair, A. C. (1990). Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat. Kanisius.
Barnes, J. (1975). Aristotle: Posterior Analytics. Clarendon Press.
Barnes, J. (1979). The Presocratic Philosophers. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bobzien, S. (1998). Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Clarendon Press.
Bogacz, S., & Tanaka, K. (2023). Dharmakīrtian Inference. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 51(1), 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-023-09546-4
Boole, G. (1854). An Investigation of the Laws of Thought on Which are Founded the Mathematical Theories of Logic and Probabilities. Walton and Maberly.
Burris, S. (2012). Boolean Algebra with Applications. Dover Publication.
Calvert, W., & Kneale, M. (1962). The Development of Logic. Clarendon Press.
Copi, I. M., & Cohen, C. (2002). Introduction to Logic (11th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Dreyfus, G. B. J. (1997). Recognizing Reality: Dharmakīrti’s Philosophy and Its Tibetan Interpretations. SUNY Press.
Dunne, J. D. (2004). Foundations of Dharmakīrti’s Philosophy. Wisdom Publications.
Fattah, G. N. (2025). Dimensi Prajñā Pāramitā Hṛdaya Sūtra dalam Logika Kontradiksi Diri Absolut Nishida Kitarō. Patisambhida: Jurnal Pemikiran Buddha Dan Filsafat, 6(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.53565/patisambhida.v6i1.1205
Fattah, G. N., & Tangrestu, V. (2024). Ketiadaan Mutlak dalam Buddhisme Zen Perspektif Pemikiran Nishida Kitarō dan Korelasinya dengan Realitas. Media Jurnal Filsafat Dan Teologi, 5(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.53396/media.v5i1.267
Franco, E. (1997). Dharmakīrti on Compassion and Rebirth. Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien.
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1965). A History of Greek Philosophy, Volume II: The Presocratic Tradition from Parmenides to Democritus. Cambridge University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1968). The Science of Logic. Routledge.
Heisig, J. W., Kasulis, T. P., & Maraldo, J. C. (2011). Japanese Philosophy: A Sourcebook. University of Hawai’i Press.
Kitarō, N. (1987). Last Writings: Nothingness and the Religious Worldview. University of Hawai’i Press.
Koft, G. (2009). Nishida’s Conception of Person. In Buddhist Philosophy: Essential Readings (pp. 358–369). terebess.hu. https://terebess.hu/zen/mesterek/nishida.pdf
Kozyra, A. (2008). Nishida Kitarō’s Logic of Absolutely Contradictory Self-Identity and the Problem of Orthodoxy in the Zen Tradition. International Research Centre for Japanese Studies, National Institute for the Humanities, 20(1), 69–110.
Mates, B. (1953). Stoic Logic. University of California Press.
Matsumoto, M. (1974). The Absolute, Relatives and Nothingness. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 28(Philosophy), 68–81.
Mundiri. (2012). Logika. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Pine, R. (2004). The Heart Sutra: The Womb of the Buddhas. Counterpoint.
Suzuki, D. T. (Ed.). (1932). The Lankavatara Sutra (Trans). Routledge.
Tillemans, T. J. F. (2000). Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇavārttika: An Annotated Translation of the Fourth Chapter (Parārthānumāna), Volume 1. Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Whitehead, A. N., & Russell, B. (1910). Principia Mathematica: Volume 1. Cambridge University Press.
Yusa, M. (2002). Zen & Philosophy: An Intellectual Biography of Nishida Kitarō. University of Hawai’i Press.

Downloads

How to Cite

Galuh Nur, G. N. (2025). Buddhist Paradoxical Logic as an Epistemological Method to the Ultimate Knowledge: From Dharmakirti’s Svavacanavirodha to Nishida’s Logic of Absolute Self-Contradiction. International Conference on Cultures & Languages, 3(1), 1031-1044. https://conferences.uinsaid.ac.id/iccl/paper/view/383